Skip to main content

HB294 Alabama 2011 Session

Updated Feb 27, 2026
Notable

Summary

Session
Regular Session 2011
Title
Certificates of need (CON), applications, procedure for granting or denying, process of contested cases streamlined, direct appeal to Court of Civil Appeals, monetary limits on costs and administrative law judge fees, Sec. 22-21-275 am'd.
Summary

HB294 would let CON appeals go directly to the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, cap certain costs and ALJ fees, and streamline the contested CON process.

What This Bill Does

It changes the appeal path for Certificate of Need decisions to allow direct appeals to the Court of Civil Appeals, skipping the Circuit Court. It imposes monetary limits on the costs and administrative law judge fees in contested CON cases and requires fee sharing among parties. It tightens and speeds up the review process with a 90-day project review period, defined extension rules, and structured timelines for hearings and record transmission. It also applies these changes to appeals of CON cases pending on the act’s start date and future filings.

Who It Affects
  • Parties to CON disputes (such as applicants and opponents) who would have a direct appeal route to the Court of Civil Appeals and face new cost and fee-sharing rules.
  • State agencies and the judiciary (SHPDA, administrative law judges, and the Court of Civil Appeals) responsible for implementing the new fee structures, streamlined timelines, and appellate procedures.
Key Provisions
  • Direct appeal of CON Board decisions to the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, bypassing the Circuit Court.
  • Monetary limits on costs and on administrative law judge fees in contested CON cases, with fees shared pro rata among all parties.
  • Approved hourly fee rates for administrative law judges and timelines for hearings, orders, and record transmission to the Court of Civil Appeals.
  • Streamlined procedures including a 90-day project review period (with possible extensions) and a nonsubstantive review for certain small-capital expenditure proposals.
AI-generated summary using openai/gpt-5-nano on Feb 24, 2026. May contain errors — refer to the official bill text for accuracy.
Subjects
Health

Bill Actions

Pending third reading on day 24 Favorable from Health

Read for the second time and placed on the calendar

Read for the first time and referred to the Senate committee on Health

Engrossed

Mitchell dissent filed

Motion to Read a Third Time and Pass adopted Roll Call 546

McClurkin motion to Table adopted Roll Call 545

Williams (J) 3rd Amendment Offered

McClurkin motion to Table adopted Roll Call 544

Williams (J) Amendment Offered

McClurkin motion to Table adopted Roll Call 543

Williams (J) Amendment Offered

McClurkin motion to Table adopted Roll Call 542

Todd Amendment Offered

Motion to Adopt lost Roll Call 541

Johnson (R) Amendment Offered

Motion to Adopt adopted Roll Call 540

McClurkin Amendment Offered

Third Reading Passed

Read for the second time and placed on the calendar

Read for the first time and referred to the House of Representatives committee on Health

Bill Text

Votes

Motion to Adopt

April 27, 2011 House Passed
Yes 78
No 3
Abstained 2
Absent 21

McClurkin motion to Table

April 27, 2011 House Passed
Yes 54
No 24
Absent 26

McClurkin motion to Table

April 27, 2011 House Passed
Yes 62
No 23
Abstained 1
Absent 18

Motion to Adopt

April 27, 2011 House Failed
Yes 20
No 58
Abstained 6
Absent 20

McClurkin motion to Table

April 27, 2011 House Passed
Yes 69
No 12
Abstained 1
Absent 22

McClurkin motion to Table

April 27, 2011 House Passed
Yes 65
No 7
Abstained 5
Absent 27

Motion to Read a Third Time and Pass

April 27, 2011 House Passed
Yes 75
No 16
Abstained 1
Absent 12

Documents

Source: Alabama Legislature