HB294 Alabama 2011 Session
Summary
- Primary Sponsor
Mary Sue McClurkinCity CouncilRepublican- Session
- Regular Session 2011
- Title
- Certificates of need (CON), applications, procedure for granting or denying, process of contested cases streamlined, direct appeal to Court of Civil Appeals, monetary limits on costs and administrative law judge fees, Sec. 22-21-275 am'd.
- Summary
HB294 would let CON appeals go directly to the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, cap certain costs and ALJ fees, and streamline the contested CON process.
What This Bill DoesIt changes the appeal path for Certificate of Need decisions to allow direct appeals to the Court of Civil Appeals, skipping the Circuit Court. It imposes monetary limits on the costs and administrative law judge fees in contested CON cases and requires fee sharing among parties. It tightens and speeds up the review process with a 90-day project review period, defined extension rules, and structured timelines for hearings and record transmission. It also applies these changes to appeals of CON cases pending on the act’s start date and future filings.
Who It Affects- Parties to CON disputes (such as applicants and opponents) who would have a direct appeal route to the Court of Civil Appeals and face new cost and fee-sharing rules.
- State agencies and the judiciary (SHPDA, administrative law judges, and the Court of Civil Appeals) responsible for implementing the new fee structures, streamlined timelines, and appellate procedures.
Key ProvisionsAI-generated summary using openai/gpt-5-nano on Feb 24, 2026. May contain errors — refer to the official bill text for accuracy.- Direct appeal of CON Board decisions to the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, bypassing the Circuit Court.
- Monetary limits on costs and on administrative law judge fees in contested CON cases, with fees shared pro rata among all parties.
- Approved hourly fee rates for administrative law judges and timelines for hearings, orders, and record transmission to the Court of Civil Appeals.
- Streamlined procedures including a 90-day project review period (with possible extensions) and a nonsubstantive review for certain small-capital expenditure proposals.
- Subjects
- Health
Bill Actions
Pending third reading on day 24 Favorable from Health
Read for the second time and placed on the calendar
Read for the first time and referred to the Senate committee on Health
Engrossed
Mitchell dissent filed
Motion to Read a Third Time and Pass adopted Roll Call 546
McClurkin motion to Table adopted Roll Call 545
Williams (J) 3rd Amendment Offered
McClurkin motion to Table adopted Roll Call 544
Williams (J) Amendment Offered
McClurkin motion to Table adopted Roll Call 543
Williams (J) Amendment Offered
McClurkin motion to Table adopted Roll Call 542
Todd Amendment Offered
Motion to Adopt lost Roll Call 541
Johnson (R) Amendment Offered
Motion to Adopt adopted Roll Call 540
McClurkin Amendment Offered
Third Reading Passed
Read for the second time and placed on the calendar
Read for the first time and referred to the House of Representatives committee on Health
Bill Text
Votes
McClurkin motion to Table
McClurkin motion to Table
Motion to Adopt
McClurkin motion to Table
McClurkin motion to Table
Motion to Read a Third Time and Pass
Documents
Source: Alabama Legislature