This past May Governor Kay Ivey signed in to law the Alabama Broadband Accessibility Act (ABAA) which was sponsored by Clay Scofield (R-Arab). While the intentions and goals of the Alabama Legislature and the Governor are noble and what we as a state should be striving for, the state needs to be thinking outside the box and thinking of creative ways to solve the problem of limited access to broadband internet. The internet and access to broadband speeds are quickly becoming the backbone of the American economy, and an essential tool to the survival of any community. The ABAA set up and funds a grant program that allows the state to award grants to the telecommunications company that invest in expanding and upgrading their networks in rural areas to provide broadband speeds. This is a good first step, as those networks are the backbone of any internet infrastructure, but it’s going to take more to ensure that our rural communities in this state have consistent and affordable access to broadband speeds.
Economics of internet network infrastructure
To be able to fully solve the problem of reliable access to broadband speeds in rural communities, The state has to recognize and understand that it is just not economically feasible to run fiber optic cabling to every nook and cranny in the state. While it is true the grant provided by the ABAA will
In an economic feasibility study, Microsoft determined that for areas with less than 2 people per square mile (PPSM) satellite internet is the best way to deliver broadband speeds. While the companies that offer satellite internet services vary in the packages they offer, they do offer a viable option for areas where it just isn’t feasible to run the necessary infrastructure to offer
In that same feasibility study, Microsoft determined that the most economical way to deliver broadband speeds to areas that have between 2 and 200 PPSM is through Wireless Internet Service Providers (WISPs). This is an emerging area of broadband access that got its start in densely populated urban areas that could work well in many parts of Alabama.
For areas with a PPSM over 200, Microsoft’s study indicates that direct to the home fiber networks are the most economical way forward.
How the Government Can Help
If government wants to have affordable and readily available access to broadband internet in rural communities, they need to work together in a coordinated effort to ensure an open and competitive marketplace among the different types of technology to ensure that people can choose the best option for them.
One of the best ways that the Federal Government can help promote the expansion of broadband access in rural communities is by incentivizing telecommunication companies to invest in that expansion. The best tool that the Federal Government has to accomplish this is the tax code. Even though these rural communities are small, a lot of times the phone lines and cable lines are owned by multibillion-dollar firms like AT&T or Comcast. While states and cities can offer financial incentives to spur investment, offering these firms a Rural Broadband Investment Tax Credit on their federal taxes would encourage them to accelerate that investment in multiple communities. Tax credits are a better way to encourage telecommunication firms to make those investments than grants because Tax credits compensate for money already spent rather than promising taxpayer money for future money that might be spent.
Another way the Federal Government is helping is by working with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to reserve frequencies throughout the country for a WISP technology called TV White Space Wireless (TVWS). TVWS is a type of wireless broadband technology that uses frequencies formerly used by analog TV Stations and the “white space” between current TV Stations to provide internet at broadband speeds wirelessly. The reason why this technology could work well for places like Alabama is
The State Government
The Alabama Broadband Accessibility Act was a
The state also needs to ensure that their regulations for satellite internet companies to enter the ISP marketplace are fair, open and the least restrictive as possible, while not giving them an unfair advantage over other providers in the marketplace. Many local Internet Service Providers will argue that they have invested millions in their networks and their communities and Satellite providers have not. This is true but shooting a satellite into space strapped to a rocket isn’t cheap either.
Local Governments can ensure a fair and competitive marketplace for broadband providers and consumers alike by writing the Franchise Agreements, contracts between the government and the companies allowing them to operate in a given area, in way that allows for competitors to move into a community to compete, or allow the government to cancel an agreement if a provider isn’t providing fast speeds and quality customer service.
The internet is quickly becoming an interictal part of all aspects of life in the United States of America. This is no different in the rural communities of our country. Even farm equipment and tools are becoming connected. This doesn’t even take into consideration the benefits that are offered to local community colleges and community hospitals that are in a small town or rural communities throughout Alabama. The state has started to take steps in ensure those communities aren’t left behind by the emerging and changing economy, but it’s time that we do more.
Latest posts by David Preston
- Group Wants to Bring Baseball Back to Mobile - November 22, 2019
- FBI To Build $1 Billion Campus In Huntsville - November 15, 2019
- Poarch Creek Tribe Proposes to Expand Gambling in Alabama - November 13, 2019